Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Interventional Cardiologist
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Interventional Cardiologist
Interventional Cardiology, 2009;4:26-30
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved over the last few years into a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases. Late gadolinium-enhanced MRI and stress myocardial perfusion MRI have been shown to be useful in detecting infarct tissue and in predicting myocardial viability and patient prognosis. The strengths of MRI lie in its ability to comprehensively image cardiac anatomy, function, perfusion, viability and physiology in ‘one-stop testing’ and to provide high-quality diagnostic information without the need for radiation. This article summarises the current clinical applications of MRI in interventional cardiology.
The evaluation of ischaemic heart disease requires the measurement of regional and global ventricular function, identification of the presence and extent of myocardial ischaemia, visualisation of luminal narrowing of the coronary arteries and assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) and viability. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved over the last decade into a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of a wide spectrum of cardiovascular disorders. It provides anatomical and functional information in acquired and congenital heart disease and is the most precise technique for the quantification of ventricular volumes, function and mass. Considerable technical and practice advances have been made since MRI was first introduced, and clinicians in the field are showing an unprecedented level of interest in it. MRI is noninvasive, has high spatial resolution and requires no potentially nephrotoxic contrast agent or radiation. It has been compared extensively with other established non-invasive imaging modalities such as electrocardiography (ECG) and nuclear cardiology (single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]), and has been shown to be superior in many scenarios, particularly for the assessment of cardiac morphology and function.
Pathophysiological processes such as MI and ischaemia, stunning and hibernation and scarring and fibrosis can be identified easily using quick and simple protocols. Recently, late gadolinium-enhanced MRI and stress myocardial perfusion MRI have been shown to be useful in detecting infarct tissue and myocardial viability and in patient prognosis. We present here an overview of the role of MRI in interventional cardiology, distinguishing two groups of patients: those with known and those with unknown coronary artery disease (CAD).
Evaluation of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
The evaluation of ischaemic heart disease requires the assessment of ventricular morphology and function, myocardial perfusion and viability and coronary flow reserve.
Myocardial Function
MRI is the ‘gold standard’ for quantifying ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and myocardial mass.1 With ECG-gated and breathhold sequences, the development of steady-state free precession sequences has provided substantially improved blood/myocardial contrast on cine MR images in a reduced imaging time, allowing more accurate and reproducible delineation of the endocardial borders. MRI uses volumetric quantification based on Simpson’s rule. Endocardial and epicardial contours are drawn during post-processing, generating end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes, ejection fraction and myocardial mass. In contrast to planar imaging modalities (2D ECG and ventriculography), MRI provides more accurate left ventricular (LV) parameter values, especially when ventricular shape deviates from the assumed geometrical model, as in ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM),2,3 and is the most reliable way to assess regional and global right ventricular (RV) function.4
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), myocardial viability, myocardium function, coronary MRI, myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome
- Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al., Eur Heart J, 2004;25:1940–65.
- Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al., Am J Cardiol, 2002;90:29–34.
- Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al., Eur Heart J, 2000;21:1387–96.
- Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, et al., Am Heart J, 2004;147:218–23.
- Hundley WG, Hamilton CA, Thomas MS, et al., Circulation, 1999;100:1697–1702.
- Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, et al., Circulation,1999;99:763–70.
- Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al., Circulation, 2004;110:835–42.
- van Rugge FP, van der Wall EE, Spanjersberg SJ, et al.,Circulation, 1994;90:127–38.
- Hundley WG, Morgan TM, Neagle CM, et al., Circulation,2002;106:2328–33.
- Kuijpers D, Ho KY, van Dijkman PR, et al., Circulation,2003;107:1592–7.
- Pennell DJ, Am J Cardiol, 2004;94(2A):26D–31D.
- Lauerma K, Virtanen KS, Sipila LM, et al., Circulation, 1997;962859–67.
- Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, et al., Radiology,2003;229:209–16.
- Sakuma H, Suzawa N, Ichikawa Y, et al., AJR Am J Roentgenol,2005;185:95–102.
- Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al., Circulation, 2001;103:2230–35.
- Bertschinger KM, Nanz D, Buechi M, et al., J Magn ResonImaging, 2001;14:556–62.
- Plein S, Ridgway JP, Jones TN, et al., Radiology, 2002;225:300–307.
- Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, et al., Circulation, 2003;108:432–7.
- Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, et al., Circulation,2004;110:732–7.
- Ishida M, Sakuma H, Kato N, et al., Radiology, 2005;237:458–64.
- Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al., Circulation, 2007;115:1769–76.
- Wu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, et al., Lancet, 2001;357:21–8.
- Gerber BL, Rochitte CE, Melin JA, et al., Circulation,2000;101:2734–41.
- Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al., Circulation,1998;97:765–72.
- Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al., Lancet, 2003;361:374–9.
- Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, et al., Circulation, 2002;106:1083–9.
- Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al., Circulation, 2002;105:162–7.
- Kuhl HP, Beek AM, van der Weerdt AP, et al., J Am CollCardiol, 2003;41:1341–8.
- Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Hirano T, et al., Radiology, 2003;226:138–44.
- McConnell MV, Ganz P, Selwyn AP, et al., Circulation, 1995;92:3158–62.
- Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, et al., J Am Coll Cardiol,2006;48:1946–50.
- McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, et al., Circulation,2003;108:54–9.
- Hombach V, Merkle N, Torzewski J, et al., Eur Heart J,2009;30(16):2011–18.
- Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al., N Engl J Med,2000;342:1163–70.
- Christenson J, Innes G, McKnight D, et al., CMAJ, 2004:1803–7.
- Kwong RY, Schussheim AE, Rekhraj S, et al., Circulation,2003;107:531–7.
- Hrobon P, Kuntz M, Hare JM, J Heart Lung Transplant,1998;17:479–86.
- Angelini A, Calzolari V, Calabrese F, et al., Heart, 2000;84:245–50.
- Kuhn H, Lawrenz T, Beer G, Med Klin, 2005;100:553–61.
- Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, et al., Circulation,2004;109:1250–58.
- Laissy JP, Hyafil F, Feldman LJ, et al., Radiology, 2005;237:75–82.
- Eitel I, Behrendt F, Schindler K, et al., Eur Heart J, 2008;29:2651–9.
- Leurent G, Larralde A, Boulmier D, et al., Int J Cardiol,2009;135:146–9.
- Elesber A, Prasad A, Bybee KA, et al., J Am Coll Cardiol,2006;47:1082–3.
- Haghi D, Athanasiadis A, Papavassiliu T, et al., Eur Heart J,2006;27:2433–9.
- Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, et al., J Am Coll Cardiol,2004;43:1315–24.
- Shellock R, D Services, Inc., Shellock FG, MRI Safety(Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education andReasearch website, 2001–2009. Available at:www.imrser.org and www.mrisafety.com
- Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Tyler DJ, et al., J Magn ResonImaging, 2006;24:312–18.
- Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, et al., Invest Radiol,2006;41:133–40.
- Tyler DJ, Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, et al., J Cardiovasc MagnReson, 2006;8:709–15.
- Wintersperger BJ, Bauner K, Reeder SB, et al., Invest Radiol,2006;41:141–7.
- Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB, Eur J Radiol, 2008;65:15–28.
- Sommer T, Hackenbroch M, Hofer U, et al., Radiology,2005;234:718–25.
- Sakuma H, J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007;26:3–13.
- 21 September 2010
- 3 October 2010






