Minimizing Cardiovascular Complications by Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
Minimizing Cardiovascular Complications by Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
Published: July 2007
Excess cardiovascular disease (CVD) with diabetes has been recognized for some time. Among diabetic individuals, CVD accounts for >50% of all deaths, and stroke accounts for an additional 15%.1 Diabetic women are at particularly high risk of CVD; diabetes eliminates the well-described female advantage for coronary disease mortality.2 This is alarming since the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing, particularly in children.3
The Connection
In his 1988 Banting lecture, Reaven noted that resistance to insulin was common among patients with coronary artery disease.4 Some of these patients were frankly diabetic, but others had mildly impaired glucose tolerance and some had normal glucose tolerance. He also identified other CVD risk factors that were associated with resistance: hypertension, elevated triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. He named this cluster ‘syndrome X.’ He attributed the co-existence of CVD risk factors and diabetes to elevated free fatty acids. The latter are increased with increasing visceral adiposity and lead to excessive triglyceride production by the liver, increased glucose output by the liver, and increased resistance to insulin in muscle cells. The rising insulin level will usually balance the resistance by increasing insulin production. In some, due to genetics, lipid or glucose toxicity, or ‘overproduction,’ insulin production fails to maintain strides with the resistance leading to various degrees of glucose intolerance. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study 5 of several thousand type 2 diabetic patients gave evidence that at the time of diagnosis of diabetes, half of beta cell function was gone. Thereafter, over the next 10–15 years, the function would continue to decline, leading to the failure of the oral antiglycemic medications and the need for insulin treatment. The implication, then, is early treatment of glucose intolerance and the associated CVD risk factors will lead to reduction in CVD events.
Diagnosing Diabetes
Diabetes is diagnosed only by the plasma glucose (see Table 1). If fasting glucose is greater than 125mg/dl on two consecutive occasions or if the second hour plasma glucose following a 75 glucose oral drink is greater than 199mg/dl on two consecutive occasions then the diagnosis of diabetes is secured.6 As mentioned above, glucose intolerance is a continuum—it is recognized that between ‘normal glucose’ and diabetes there exists a prediabetes condition. There are two forms of prediabetes: impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). IFG is diagnosed when the fasting plasma glucose is 100–125mg/dl on two consecutive periods and IGT is diagnosed when the second hour following a 75g oral glucose drink is 140–199mg/dl on two consecutive periods. It is important to properly diagnose these conditions. A person with prediabetes suffers an 11% chance/year of developing diabetes.7 Owing to the clustering of other CVD risk factors, such diagnosed patients have a greater risk of developing CVD. Owing to the genetic nature of glucose intolerance, family members of patients with prediabetes are also at increased risk for the same.
- Harris MI, Cowie CC, Stern MP, et al., Diabetes in America, 2nd
Edition, Government Printing Office, National Institutes of Health,
1995;publ. no. 95-1:468.
- Manson JE, Spelsberg A, Risk modification in the diabetic patient,
Prevention of Myocardial Infarction, Oxford University Press, New
York, 1996:241–73.
- Haines L,Wan KC, Lynn R, et al., Rising incidence of type 2
diabetes in children in the United Kingdom, Diabetes,
2007;30(5):1097–1101.
- Reaven GM, Role of insulin resistance in human disease, Diabetes,
1988;37:1595–607.
- Holman RR, Assessing the potential for alpha-glucosidase
inhibitors in prediabetic states, Diabetes Res Clin Pract,
1998;40(suppl):S21–S25.
- American Diabetes Association, Clinical Practice
Recommendations 2007, Diabetes Care, 2007;30(suppl 1):
S1–S103.
- Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al., Diabetes
Prevention Program Research Group: Reduction in the incidence of
type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin, N Engl J
Med, 2002;346:393–403.
- Nathan DM, Davidson MB, DeFronzo RA,et al., Impaired Fasting
Glucose and Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Implications for care,
Diabetes Care, 2007;30:753–9.
- Ratner R, Goldberg R, Haffner S, et al., The DPP Research Group:
Impact of intensive lifestyle and metformin therapy on
cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Diabetes Prevention
Program, Diabetes Care, 2005;28:888–94.
- Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, et al., The STOP-NIDDM Trial
Research Group: Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes
mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomized trial, Lancet, 2002;359:
2072–7.
- Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, et al., Preservation of
pancreatic ß-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by
pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk
Hispanic women, Diabetes, 2002;51:2796–2803.
- Xiang, AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL, et al., Effect of Pioglitazone on
Pancreatic ß-Cell Function and Diabetes Risk in Hispanic Women
With Prior Gestational Diabetes, Diabetes, 2006;55:517–22.
- Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Boxch J, et al., DREAM (Diabetes Reduction
Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication) Trial
Investigators: effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes
in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting
glucose: a randomized controlled trial, Lancet, 2006;368:
1096–105.
- Mazzone T, Meyer PM, Feinstein SB, et al., Effect of Pioglitazone
Compared With Glimepiride on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in
Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial, JAMA, 2006;296:2572–81.
- Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, et al., The PROactive Investigators: Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macro Vascular Events): a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 2005;366:1279–89.
- 15 January 2009




add new comment Comments